Loading the next useful route.
Loading the next useful route.
Fundraising guide
Use this to understand what European fundraising rewards instead of importing a Silicon Valley script that doesn't fit.
A practical first-check fundraising guide for Europe: what to prove, who to meet, how to run the round, and how local instruments, grants, and cross-border investor maps change the raise.
Best for pre-seed and first-check conversations across European hubs
Action checkpoints
Start with these sections when you want the practical moves before reading the full guide.
Europe is different, not worse
Do not cosplay Silicon Valley. Europe is fragmented, relationship-heavy, and unevenly capitalized. That can be annoying. It can also be an advantage if you use local credibility, public money, and cross-border investor maps instead of pretending the continent is one giant Sand Hill Road.
At first-check stage, the investor is usually underwriting founder judgment, market pull, and speed of learning. The deck matters. The work behind the deck matters more. Your job is to make the case simple enough that a good investor can retell it without you in the room.
Not every good company is a venture case
A company can make you wealthy, useful, and proud without being a VC-backed company. Venture money is built for outlier outcomes because the investor's portfolio needs a few companies to carry many losses. If your company can be excellent without that pressure, keep the optionality.
If you do raise VC, raise because the money changes the slope: faster learning, faster distribution, harder technical risk reduction, or a real shot at a market big enough to repay the pressure.
Credentials, innovation, execution
Most first-check decisions sit on three vectors: credentials, innovation, and execution. Credentials are why this team gets unusual access or insight. Innovation is why the company is meaningfully different, not just nicer. Execution is proof that the market is starting to move toward you.
You usually want to be strong on two of the three. If one is weak, do not hope investors ignore it. Patch the gap with evidence, expert signal, or a tighter story about why this wedge works now.
Pre-seed is an expectations market
At first-check stage, investors are buying an expectation about where the company could go. 'We are better than X' is a hard sell. 'The world changed, so a different company can now exist' is easier to believe and easier to repeat.
Anchor the round around an insight, not a vague milestone. The insight can come from a prototype, customer discovery, a technical unlock, a regulatory shift, or a new usage pattern. The round should feel like fuel for something already starting to move.
Capital has geography and taste
London still has depth. Paris has serious state-backed infrastructure and an AI/deep-tech center of gravity. Berlin remains useful for B2B, climate, infra, and operator angels. Stockholm and the Nordics have a strong record of building global companies from focused local scenes. Zurich and Munich can be strong for deep tech, robotics, and technical talent. But good investors increasingly look across borders, especially when the category is sharp.
Start with your category, then map the cities and funds that actually care. A generic list of 'top European VCs' is less useful than 40 investors who have already backed your wedge.
Pre-seed is not one thing
A first check can mean friends and angels, an accelerator cheque, a grant-backed technical build, an operator syndicate, a small expert round, or a proper pre-seed led by a fund. These are different games with different evidence bars.
Make diligence boring
A deck is a compression artifact. The investor should feel that there is real evidence behind every slide, not a beautiful story with nothing underneath. Build the evidence pack first, then let the deck point to it.
You do not need to know the perfect round size on day one. You do need a thoughtful range. Saying 'we are thinking about EUR 500k to EUR 1.5m depending on lead, dilution, and speed' is stronger than sounding like the market is in charge of your company.
Five to ten slides, not a data room
The deck should give enough context to make a serious investor want the conversation. It should not try to answer every diligence question. If the deck does all the talking, the meeting has less room to become useful.
Think of the deck as the public layer of the evidence pack: crisp enough to forward, specific enough to remember, and short enough that the strongest parts of the company do not get buried.
Make the company easy to repeat
Send the deck before the call. Assume some people skimmed it, some did not, and someone junior may be carrying the first read. Your job in the meeting is not to recite every slide. It is to create a crisp mental model and then have a real conversation.
The elevator pitch that matters is often investor to investor: an associate to a partner, an angel to another angel, a partner to the Monday meeting. If they cannot repeat what you do in a way that sounds exciting, the meeting did not work yet.
Experts beat generic startup heat
If investors do not yet believe the credentials or innovation case, do not just grind more calls. Go to the people they would call for diligence. A respected operator, researcher, buyer, regulator, technical advisor, or former founder in the adjacent space can change the room faster than another generic VC meeting.
Rounds are cold until they are hot
European fundraising often feels slow because founders start the relationship graph too late. Build lightweight familiarity before the round is open, then run the actual raise in a tight window. A company that has been vaguely fundraising for months starts to look like the market already passed.
The underrated opener is: 'We are not fundraising yet, but we are pressure-testing the round and would value your view.' It lets you test appetite without officially sitting on the market. If someone is genuinely bullish, they will often try to move anyway.
Do not make people invent the next step
Templates are useful because fundraising breaks when every ask is vague. Rewrite these in your own voice, keep them short, and make the next action painfully easy.
Too early can become now
A pass is not always a dead relationship. Sometimes it means the investor does not believe one vector yet: traction, category timing, founder edge, technical risk, or round shape. Respond well, extract the real reason if you can, then keep building.
The worst follow-up is a generic 'just checking in'. The useful follow-up is a compact proof update that shows the company moved since the last conversation.
Velocity beats over-optimization
The cleanest round closes around a real lead. A term sheet derisks the rest of the round because everyone can see the company will have enough capital to move. But leads are binary and slow, especially at pre-seed. Have a second path.
If a lead is not ready, stage credible commitments: expert angels, operator advisors, small checks on local convertible instruments, or specific soft commits that become real when the round has a lead. The goal is motion without pretending the round is done.
SAFE is not the whole continent
Fundraising paper still varies by jurisdiction. The UK often uses Advanced Subscription Agreements. Germany commonly uses convertible loans. France often uses BSA AIR. The Netherlands is comfortable with convertible notes. The important point is not to memorize every legal form; it is to stop assuming every investor conversation ends in the same document.
Decide your company home early enough that the paperwork story does not become a confidence problem mid-raise. If you are unsure, talk to founders and counsel who have raised from the investors you want before you send terms.
Non-dilutive money is leverage, not a lifestyle
Europe has real grant and public-finance leverage, especially for deep tech, climate, research-heavy products, hardware, and industrial innovation. Use it when it accelerates the company. Avoid it when it turns the company into a proposal-writing machine.
The partner matters after the wire
The wrong investor can create more drag than the money solves. When a fund is trying to win the deal, everyone is on their best behavior. Check what happens after the wire: who shows up, who understands the company, who makes useful introductions, and who vanishes when the company is not the hottest thing in the portfolio.
Founder-friendly is in the details
A term sheet is not just proof that someone believes in the company. It is the first draft of how power, downside protection, and future decisions will work. Use proper counsel, especially across jurisdictions, and do not let speed make you casual about terms.
Ambition without theatre
Europe is not anti-ambition. It is anti-empty performance. You can be bold here, but the boldness has to connect to evidence. Investors respond to speed, customer pull, technical depth, founder edge, and a sharp category read. They respond less well to pretending every slide is already a category-defining inevitability.
The raise is a bridge
Closing the round is a milestone, not the company. Celebrate it, then get back to the work the money was supposed to accelerate: customer pull, product depth, retention, revenue, technical risk reduction, hiring, and the next proof point.
The best announcement is usually not the announcement. It is the six months after, when the company becomes obviously sharper because the capital turned into learning, speed, and compounding signal.
Stay close to the signal
Event picks, useful Europe updates, and the occasional interview or video.